Alex Jones destroys Pierce Morgan on CNN

[Jackalope]

[video=youtube;-Svxjz6Aab8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Svxjz6Aab8[/video]

 

[Jackalope]

[video=youtube;P9nmsmK_apg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9nmsmK_apg[/video]

 

[Gordo]

Is alex jones the 'new world order' guy?

 

[Mike]

AJ makes good valid points, but he needs to work on his delivery. He sounds nuts. :smiley_clap:

 

[Jackalope]

AJ makes good valid points, but he needs to work on his delivery. He sounds nuts. :smiley_clap:

You can't seem "timid" when debating liberals. They'll always try to play the intellectual card and appear smarter. You have to bust em in the mouth like BAM! that's the problem, we always play nice. Be it the gun grabbers or the free huggers. They will not listen to logic and will not stop until they have accomplished their mission of destroying America as we know it. So why try. Tell facts and logic then tell em to STFU and bring it. When CNN promised him 3 segments. After the 2nd the producer came running in tears streaming down her face saying "this is not how it was supposed to go". Then ordered security to escort Alex out.

 

[epe]

Heard parts on the radio today.. Loved it..

 

[Mike]

You can't seem "timid" when debating liberals. They'll always try to play the intellectual card and appear smarter. You have to bust em in the mouth like BAM! that's the problem, we always play nice. Be it the gun grabbers or the free huggers. They will not listen to logic and will not stop until they have accomplished their mission of destroying America as we know it. So why try. Tell facts and logic then tell em to STFU and bring it. When CNN promised him 3 segments. After the 2nd the producer came running in tears streaming down her face saying "this is not how it was supposed to go". Then ordered security to escort Alex out.

I can agree with that.

 

[Huckleberry Finn]

Love it

 

[xbowguy]

Yeah! They sure don't want to talk about all the other deaths. One-sided pieces of shit.

 

[at1010]

it was decent, thought he lost his credibility by not allowing Piers to ask questions.

I think he had good points, not sure if he approached it the right way throughout the entire video.

 

[Diablo54]

That was great

 

[k.stone]

You can't seem "timid" when debating liberals. They'll always try to play the intellectual card and appear smarter. You have to bust em in the mouth like BAM! that's the problem, we always play nice. Be it the gun grabbers or the free huggers. They will not listen to logic and will not stop until they have accomplished their mission of destroying America as we know it. So why try. Tell facts and logic then tell em to STFU and bring it. When CNN promised him 3 segments. After the 2nd the producer came running in tears streaming down her face saying "this is not how it was supposed to go". Then ordered security to escort Alex out.

Agree.

 

[Ohiosam]

Mostly he was good but the challenge to fight and whatever he tried to say about sharks was goofy. I agree with his dominating the discussion and keeping PM quiet was a good tactic.

 

[Archertl]

Good stuff. I think he could have left out some of the stranger comments and the British accent imitation.
I wish I could find the clip of Jeremy Clarkson from top gear punching Piers Morgan in the face.

 

[Jackalope]

Mostly he was good but the challenge to fight and whatever he tried to say about sharks was goofy. I agree with his dominating the discussion and keeping PM quiet was a good tactic.

He said when the movie jaws came out people were scared to go swimming despite only 5 people a year die by great whites. Meaning the media is about fear mongering

 

[at1010]

He said when the movie jaws came out people were scared to go swimming despite only 5 people a year die by great whites. Meaning the media is about fear mongering

OO that makes more sense! See I think it would have been better if he would have stayed calm, but been explosive on his main points. The constant yelling, might get supports from OUR side of the argument, but what about trying to be logical(like his points where) to sway some of the other side?

I thought that when he said England has several hundreds of gun murders and Piers said only 35 made him look kinda bad, he should have just said I am not sure.

Overall, very good points, needs a bit more structure. IMO

 

[Jackalope]

OO that makes more sense! See I think it would have been better if he would have stayed calm, but been explosive on his main points. The constant yelling, might get supports from OUR side of the argument, but what about trying to be logical(like his points where) to sway some of the other side?

I thought that when he said England has several hundreds of gun murders and Piers said only 35 made him look kinda bad, he should have just said I am not sure.

Overall, very good points, needs a bit more structure. IMO

He tried. He said "not many" and "very few" many times. But pierce kept pushing for a number. But the number is irrelevant. See that's why you can't debate liberals on a logical level. They just look for one thing ignoring the rest of logic. Never mind that the uk has a violent crime rate that has tripled. Never mind they are the violent crime capital of Europe. Pierce would ignore it and talk over Alex to move on. The goal wasn't to win the hearts and minds of gun owners or non gun owners. The point was to make pierce look like an idiot with an illogical argument. And it worked. Pierces slot is being moved to a later time and CNN will eventually shit can him. They expect him to lead the debate and get out their agenda. He failed and their pharmaceutical sponsors got bashed in the process.

 

[hickslawns]

He tried. He said "not many" and "very few" many times. But pierce kept pushing for a number. But the number is irrelevant. See that's why you can't debate liberals on a logical level. They just look for one thing ignoring the rest of logic. Never mind that the uk has a violent crime rate that has tripled. Never mind they are the violent crime capital of Europe. Pierce would ignore it and talk over Alex to move on. The goal wasn't to win the hearts and minds of gun owners or non gun owners. The point was to make pierce look like an idiot with an illogical argument. And it worked. Pierces slot is being moved to a later time and CNN will eventually shit can him. They expect him to lead the debate and get out their agenda. He failed and their pharmaceutical sponsors got bashed in the process.

I would imagine the constant attack on their sponsors wasn't taken very well by the sponsors. hahahah

AJ looked like a ravenous lunatic. I think he painted a horrible picture of gun rights supporters. Piers actually remained cool. On the flip side, where else has a gun rights supporter gotten any attention on CNN? I know they interviewed another guy and we chatted about this interview last week. Forgot his name already. Larry?

Piers should really go back to Britain. He is not wanted in the USA. Screw him and his unrealistic agenda.

 

[Jackalope]

Here is an example of what happens when you try to have a civil discussion with a liberal like Pierce Morgan. As you will see from the video there is absolutely no sense and even entertaining his argument. He will ignore facts and logic and pick on one simple misplay of words in order to try to prove his point and then he will talk over you and call you stupid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC4JJWUtzkc&feature=youtube_gdata_player

 

[finelyshedded]

I totally agree with Joe on how you have to take control of the discussion otherwise the host will do the same and DODGE your questions. That is why I hate radio talk personalities. They say what they believe and when someone disagrees they cut them off and talk over them with their opinion and then say, "That person was stupid and doesn't know what he's talking about, Ok...next caller!" I HATE THAT! So I turn it off!

As far as AJ vs PM, AJ(IMO) is just sick and tired and pissed of how these liberals in the media spread their rhetoric with the ability of controlling the conversation or discussion. Good for him and he kicked PMs ASS!