Joe says drama is good for business, so enjoy a dose courtesy of us snotty breed snobs!
To get us back up to speed...
So now that you've heard from a couple breed snobs, this gem requires further debate...
Some of the worst dogs are mutts and some of the best dogs are purebreds, so... what's your point? My grandma owned the dumbest golden retriever to walk the planet. Greg and Mike have excellent goldens that do a great job of representing the best of their breed. Do I need to point of the same dichotomy in humans?!?
Asking your original question was like showing up to an OSTA shoot in 2005 and asking "what's wrong with crossbows?" After all, all bows are archery equipment, right? Well to an old timer toting a selfbow that adheres to "breed" standards set forth by OSTA would beg to differ with the notion that all bows are created equal. This is no different and labs aren't the only breed to deal with this type of debate.
What JB and I laid out was not some "snotty purebred dog bullshit". We actually presented some of the science behind why there's a question about the legitimacy of silver labs, and we also presented the official stance of the organizations that oversee the breeds. Is supporting the strict adherence to gun saftey as articulated by the NRA some "snotty gun owner bullshit"?
Neither he nor I, know the scientific truth as to whether a silver lab is indeed purebred or not (and we both acknowledge such). In fact, there's debate about whether any dog is "purebred" since all breeds originated in wolves or a similar canid of "wolfish" nature. So is a purebred poodle a purebred dog? Well, that depends on what standard you're holding it to and in the instance of labs, the breed standard doesn't currently recognize silvers as a "purebred" variety.
The floor is open for rebuttal...
To get us back up to speed...
... And what is wrong with silver labs.
Someone had to ask...(Just some inside lab owner humor
)
To start with, it's not a recognized color by the AKC, which causes folks some heartburn. However, the AKC does recognize a wide-range of shades in yellow from "vanilla" like my pup, to fox reds. Those variations in shade are under less scrutiny genetically speaking. Traditionally, there were no variations in blacks and chocolates (the other two recognized colors), then silver came along and they're a "diluted" chocolate. Many people feel, including some of the world's larger kennel associations, that silvers are the result of "unscrupulous" breeding habits and there's some science to back that theory up. The same "dilution" gene that allows for the expression of the "genetic mutation" (silver coat) is also found in Weimaraners.
You can register a silver with AKC and it will go in as a chocolate, but whether it meets breed standards is a whole different Pandora's box.
IMO, the definitive statement on the subject: https://thelabradorclub.com/news/akc-lrc-joint-statement-on-alleged-silver-labradors/
Well, purebred Labs haven't been documented carrying the recessive dilute alleles, at least not that I'm aware of. So that basically leaves two potential scenarios. 1., The dd allele was a simple gene mutation that came out of nowhere, and was selected for in subsequent breeding's, or 2., The recessive alleles were introduced by cross breeding with a known carrier of the dilute alleles, like a Weimereiner. I don't know what my stance is as far as Silvers being "purebred" or not. But to me, scenario #2 seems to be the most probable, especially considering how most every Silver I've seen has a weird, non-Labradorish look to it.
So now that you've heard from a couple breed snobs, this gem requires further debate...
I knew it was a snotty purebred dog bullshit. Some of the best dogs are mutts and some of the worst dogs are purebreds
Some of the worst dogs are mutts and some of the best dogs are purebreds, so... what's your point? My grandma owned the dumbest golden retriever to walk the planet. Greg and Mike have excellent goldens that do a great job of representing the best of their breed. Do I need to point of the same dichotomy in humans?!?
Asking your original question was like showing up to an OSTA shoot in 2005 and asking "what's wrong with crossbows?" After all, all bows are archery equipment, right? Well to an old timer toting a selfbow that adheres to "breed" standards set forth by OSTA would beg to differ with the notion that all bows are created equal. This is no different and labs aren't the only breed to deal with this type of debate.
What JB and I laid out was not some "snotty purebred dog bullshit". We actually presented some of the science behind why there's a question about the legitimacy of silver labs, and we also presented the official stance of the organizations that oversee the breeds. Is supporting the strict adherence to gun saftey as articulated by the NRA some "snotty gun owner bullshit"?
Neither he nor I, know the scientific truth as to whether a silver lab is indeed purebred or not (and we both acknowledge such). In fact, there's debate about whether any dog is "purebred" since all breeds originated in wolves or a similar canid of "wolfish" nature. So is a purebred poodle a purebred dog? Well, that depends on what standard you're holding it to and in the instance of labs, the breed standard doesn't currently recognize silvers as a "purebred" variety.
The floor is open for rebuttal...
