in everyones opinion which do you guys thinks matters most for hunting arrows, built for speed or penetration?
Penetration overrules speed
The laws of KE. Heavy and slow vs fast and light. They both bisect at a point, after which they run in parallel. You can get the same KE out of a fast and light arrow as you can a heavy slow one. To a point.. You can only do so much in the fast and light department, but you can always make it heavier and slower.. The happy median is the ease of hitting your target.. You can shoot a big old lincoln log arrow and knock them down. But you'll have plenty of drop and really have to know your yardages.. Or you can shoot a fast and light arrow where it's far less a problem as the arrow shoots flatter... The happy median will be Maximum KE, for a acceptable speed and trajectory. Each bow, and archer is different with respects to draw length and poundage. The real question becomes. I need to push a heavier arrow faster.. The past 20 years of bow architecture and sales has been centered around that single statement.. Push a heavier arrow faster... But there will always be those that use that to push a lighter arrow even faster..
I think a well-placed arrow is the best, hands down. :smiley_coolpeace:
correct, IMHO the broadhead is much more important than the speed difference. Broadheads work very differently and can increase or decrease results.I tend to go for the speed side of the spectrum. My arrows weigh 392. WHich isnt super light, but isnt really all that heavy. I dont care what arrow you are shooting at what weight you will have no problems penetrating a deers chest wall. THe problem occurs when the shooulder is brought into the equation. I dont know anyone that aims purposfully at the shoulder, if they do, they need a little instruction. Thats why in a previous post shot placement was brought up. Do bad shots happen? Yup, they sure do. But I go for speed as opposed to KE for a couple reasons. One, is pin gap. Two is speed itself. The arrow drops less, and allows more forgiveness in judging yardeges.
Although, KE has its perks also. A heavy slower arrow tunes better than a light fast arrow! A heavy arrow hits harder. A heavier arrow will quiet a bow more than a lighter arrow will.
Its six of one, a half dozen of another. Unfortunately it is all a matter of opinion. There is no way of saying one is better than the other, if there was than you wouldnt have to ask this question and we would all be doing it.
dang you guys know your stuff, im kinda lost still on the KE part but i can follow what you guys say about push a heavy arrow faster and push a lighter arrow even faster, IMO after shooting these arrows i just got they seem to fly the same as lighter arrows or maybe its just something i cant tell, at 30 yards it seems to take a lil slight bit longer to hit the target but still has a good amount of speed upon impact, so is it really just a matter of distance is where its taking place the most? like for instance at 5 or 10 yards a heavy arrow will get there just as quick as a lighter arrow but at 25 or 30 or 40 etc is where you really notice the drop and longer time to get to the target?? does that make any sense at all
the forces that slow an arrow ONLY act on its velocity. Mass is conserved through the impact. given all forces equal the heavier on wins on mass conservation principles simply. i could go into it more but it may confuse some.
Push the heaviest arrow you can, as fast as you can, to achieve maximum KE...