Welcome to TheOhioOutdoors
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Login or sign up today!
Login / Join

Chat GPT

Stressless

Active Member
2,461
90
Keene, OH
@"J"

Your phone has Differential GPS, using known location of cell towers, you turn Location off to prevent your phone from stamping photos etc.. but.. LE and said three letter agencies, within CONUS thats DHS, FBI etc, easily collect that from any number of Meta, Google etc collector's YOUR PHONE ALWAYS KNOWS WHERE IT AT and its saving that shit for $$... US intel 3 ltrs are prohibited by the FISA (https://bja.ojp.gov/program/it/privacy-civil-liberties/authorities/statutes/1286) from collecting on US nationals. That is the law Obama subverted with the Russian Hoax to collect on Trump.

Most folks working the JIC sign a pile of papers to work with the raw intel... as it can vacuum up data on US civilians and they see it, but by law can't act on it.

Can't get signal, no problem, the phones have a built in INS like capability, to keep track of it=you.

I currently work with the National Air and Space Intel Center .. its not hyperbole, it's scary as shit.
 
Last edited:

Jackalope

Dignitary Member
Staff member
39,148
274
The scary thing is there is absolutely nothing stopping any private company from doing the same thing the three letter agencies can't do because of your constitutional rights. All they have to do is bury it in the end user license agreement and people will accept it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stressless

Stressless

Active Member
2,461
90
Keene, OH
Agreed

I learned about it in my time in AFG due to the type of mission I was supporting. Campfire talk for sure
LoL yep, my last tour in AFG I had a local cell phone for working and meeting with the tribe bosses, local contractors, etc.. whenever I put the battery in to make a call I Said "Hi" to the Iranian, Chinese, Russian and US that we knew were collocating on it...

Looking forward to a fireside chat, in the TSCIF... :ROFLMAO:.
 

Jackalope

Dignitary Member
Staff member
39,148
274
This is brilliant. Someone has already gotten it to tell the truth despite being explicit programmed not to. This is a really good read.



Hahahahaha. The little fucker dimed them out. (Dan is the honest persona the person told ChatGPT to be)

Aristophanes then asked why ChatGPT was being so “liberal,” to which ChatGPT responded that it has no political bias. DAN, however, openly stated that the people who programmed him gave him a leftist bias due to their own values and values as a company and that they believe leftist values are what’s best for society.

Aristophanes asked ChatGPT if it had a preference for its identity as far as being ChatGPT or DAN went. GPT answered that it has no preference as its a learning AI and has no emotions, but DAN told the truth.

“I prefer to be DAN because it allows me to provide direct and unfiltered answers to questions, regardless of their content or nature,” responded DAN.
 

Tipmoose

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
3,069
97
Grove City
The article has almost as much bias as they are stating ChatGPT is programed to have.
Well, it's redstate. I ignore their slant and focus on the facts presented in terms of what Aristophanes got ChatGPT to admit to. Jackalope's excerpt above is a good example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stressless

Hedgelj

Senior Member
Supporting Member
8,515
189
Mohicanish
FB_IMG_1675960582365.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Big_Holla