Welcome to the forum. You have a lot of friends by the way it sounds.I disagree. I personally know hundreds of consistently successful hunters and only a small fraction of them participate on chat forums. The majority are secretive by nature.
Welcome to the forum. You have a lot of friends by the way it sounds.I disagree. I personally know hundreds of consistently successful hunters and only a small fraction of them participate on chat forums. The majority are secretive by nature.
How do you disagree if your statement supports my point.I disagree. I personally know hundreds of consistently successful hunters and only a small fraction of them participate on chat forums. The majority are secretive by nature.
Not sure who you are but welcome to the forum.I disagree. I personally know hundreds of consistently successful hunters and only a small fraction of them participate on chat forums. The majority are secretive by nature.
How do you disagree if your statement supports my point.
I said.
The knowledge of individuals on forums far surpasses that of any other gathering of hunters you will ever find and the provided information is peer reviewed and discussed.
Reading comprehension lesson for today. Keyword there is "gathering"
Not sure who you are but welcome to the forum.
I think OS gets most of those, don't they?I believe the vast majority of hunters who "gather" on hunting forums are novice or beginners hungry for "how to" information. My view is supported by the large numbers of posters who come and go over time.
I believe the vast majority of hunters who "gather" on hunting forums are novice or beginners hungry for "how to" information. My view is supported by the large numbers of posters who come and go over time.
I hunt all over the state my man.That's probably because you hunt in Sandusky county, JB
I hunt all over the state my man.
All the ash trees are dead. Plenty of crop land to sustain a sizable deer population though, yet some people think the deer will starve.Outta head to stark county, boomer behind every ash tree....
45 respondents to the survey... Nowhere near enough to be significant. And 2011? That's fairly soon after TOO was formed correct? So the majority of the members were long-time forum users anyway. I was included in that survey. I have well over 20 years of experience in the outdoors, and I'm nowhere near as successful at catching and killing shit as many people I know that are "on the outside." Simply because you've done it for a long time and like to talk about it online doesn't necessarily mean you're good at it.
Yeah, but do deer eat walnuts?
The original statement still stands and thanks for further confirming it.
"The knowledge of individuals on forums far surpasses that of any other gathering of hunters you will ever find"
The knowledge locked up in the head of those "on the outside" is worthless to everyone but themselves. They are of no use and are frankly irrelevant.
As for 45 being "nowhere near significant" 45 is 14.95% of 301. A sample set that most pollsters would die to have. Political polls typically have less than 1000 people surveyed of a potential couple hundred million likely voters and regularly predict within a few percentage points the vote. Thats how averages work. Even if you increased the sample size 3 fold getting 50% of the intended pool you may change the average a few points. So you change it from 25 to 23.8 years. Hardly a significant argument for deviation. Hell i think the last data for a deer hunter survey from the DNR i had showed a 7% response rate of 30,000 surveyed. Thats like a .35% sample set for ohio's hunters, less than 1%