35 degrees in the hills near Athens this morning. I want to see that first frost so badly to know this junk is over for the year.
Yup, frost at strouds this morning.
FawnsAnybody seeing much out there?
Saw this one yesterday, he kept saying it’s off by a huge amount. Kept referencing 120 deer per square mile. Has me questioning that number to begin with. Not saying the numbers aren’t significantly down, but 120 deer in a square mile seems awfully high for a normal count.
Saw this one yesterday, he kept saying it’s off by a huge amount. Kept referencing 120 deer per square mile. Has me questioning that number to begin with. Not saying the numbers are significantly down, but 120 deer in a square mile seems awfully high for a normal count.
I have had this conversation with a few friends who are biologists, and there does seem to be a lot of confusion about these drone surveys on DPSM. Maybe JB @jagermeister could weigh in a bit as well on this.Saw this one yesterday, he kept saying it’s off by a huge amount. Kept referencing 120 deer per square mile. Has me questioning that number to begin with. Not saying the numbers are significantly down, but 120 deer in a square mile seems awfully high for a normal count.
It takes away any sense of compassion you might have. Yes. Now you're down to NW Ohio numbers. Boohoo. I hunted there years ago (Hocking/Vinton). You could walk from the stand to your truck on the backs of the deer and never touch the ground. Never seen anything like it on my life.Saw this one yesterday, he kept saying it’s off by a huge amount. Kept referencing 120 deer per square mile. Has me questioning that number to begin with. Not saying the numbers are significantly down, but 120 deer in a square mile seems awfully high for a normal count.
Back in the day, Penna. issued antlerless deer licenses based upon a county by county allotment. There are 67 county's in Pa and the county treasurer and their department issued them and were paid to do so. Then the PGC stated that the system wasn't efficient in controlling deer numbers as there were pockets of over-harvest and under-harvest, so they were going to correct that by going to wildlife management units (WMU's). So now the cost to issue is higher, the allotment is higher and there are only 21 WMU's covering multiple county's each... It always was about the money as these licenses are issued through the PGC directly, or through retail outlets now.I have had this conversation with a few friends who are biologists, and there does seem to be a lot of confusion about these drone surveys on DPSM. Maybe JB @jagermeister could weigh in a bit as well on this.
I can say I've listened to several drone podcasts, and these guys always say the same thing: "Most areas have more deer than they realize." The one gentleman in MO referenced how many farms were in that 120-160 dpsm.
All that to say, if I had to guess, it is probably true that A square mile could be at 120. However, that likely isnt repeated in Ohio, on all adjacent sq miles. You end up with "sinks" that create voids or lower DPSM in other areas. I dont know for certain, but I believe that if/when a DNR does a DPSM, they would likely use a larger area and then take an average. So if you do a township, sure you'll see some huge areas of high DPSM, but others with far less, which drives the average down to around 35-60 DPSM in most areas.
I personally dont feel that even the highest levels of academia have a GREAT grasp on DPSM, distribution, re-distribution, compensatory reproduction, etc. Not that they dont understand it, but because of the number of variables that impact the white-tailed deer. I believe that these drones, in the correct hands, will be very helpful in understanding that topic in the future, which will have hugely positive impacts on hunters but also ecological habitat/harvest decisions.
Just my 2 cents!
I agree with this.I have had this conversation with a few friends who are biologists, and there does seem to be a lot of confusion about these drone surveys on DPSM. Maybe JB @jagermeister could weigh in a bit as well on this.
I can say I've listened to several drone podcasts, and these guys always say the same thing: "Most areas have more deer than they realize." The one gentleman in MO referenced how many farms were in that 120-160 dpsm.
All that to say, if I had to guess, it is probably true that A square mile could be at 120. However, that likely isnt repeated in Ohio, on all adjacent sq miles. You end up with "sinks" that create voids or lower DPSM in other areas. I dont know for certain, but I believe that if/when a DNR does a DPSM, they would likely use a larger area and then take an average. So if you do a township, sure you'll see some huge areas of high DPSM, but others with far less, which drives the average down to around 35-60 DPSM in most areas.
I personally dont feel that even the highest levels of academia have a GREAT grasp on DPSM, distribution, re-distribution, compensatory reproduction, etc. Not that they dont understand it, but because of the number of variables that impact the white-tailed deer. I believe that these drones, in the correct hands, will be very helpful in understanding that topic in the future, which will have hugely positive impacts on hunters but also ecological habitat/harvest decisions.
Just my 2 cents!
Haha, walk on the backs of deerIt takes away any sense of compassion you might have. Yes. Now you're down to NW Ohio numbers. Boohoo. I hunted there years ago (Hocking/Vinton). You could walk from the stand to your truck on the backs of the deer and never touch the ground. Never seen anything like it on my life.
That said, I've seen EHD firsthand. It sucks for sure. I don't think the guy knew his density which makes me question anything he said. It's just a guessing game. To be fair, I watched 5 min and zoomed forward thru a lot of the drone footage. Got tired of listening to him. It didn't seem believable. He seemed dramatic. When he said he deployed his resources into other areas to hunt and make videos I sort of lost any compassion. Then I Skipped to the end for a summary.