Golf IS a pain in the ass! I used to be a 7 handicap, had a kid, lucky to be an 18 now! That's painful too!
"TV shows are the worst thing that happened to this sport.... "
That and the fact that the ODNR should have increased non resident licenses to at least $500.
When non residents flew here like those crossing the Rio Grande and started the leasing for millions of dollars, they could afford $5000 a year deer permits.
Here's my .02... I am a non resident and lease land in Ohio. All of us in the lease are middle class guys that work hard and have given up on big bucks where we live (mostly southern WV and now i'm in PA) due to poaching and AWFUL hunting regulations. Ohio takes care of their bucks with strict regulations and policing - only one reason people come to Ohio to hunt --> Better hunting and bigger bucks!! Kudos to ODNR! Increasing the non resident tag to $500, as few has said above, will only drop the amount of hunters a small amount; I'd guess 85% or more would still purchase. So increasing it to $500 won't solve the problems residents are saying non residents are causing. I personally know many farmers that were struggling to get by and now they are leasing their hunting rights to pay for the taxes and put a few dimes in their pocket. I also know small biz owners that love seeing the non residents purchase gas, supplies, food, etc at their stores. I personally think the bubble on leasing in Ohio will bust soon, guessing next 3 years. Look at Illinois - just a few years ago Illinois leases were insane and you couldn't lease a 3 legged dog out there due to demand. NOW there are thousands of available acres to lease in Illinois for much less prices compared to Ohio now due to people finally saying enough is enough with crazy high prices and I feel much of them have came to Ohio in the last 5 years when prices were much lower. I look at Kentucky and see it being in the same stage as Ohio about 5 to 7 years ago and I'm sure it will continue to rise. I also think this crazy society we live in has changed "permission" or free range areas. Now if someone gets hurt while hunting a free range property I'm sure an attorney will advise them to sue; that's ridiculous and I don't blame landowners for cashing in and being more secure with liability. Not all landowners are hunters and they are taking advantage of the income and peace of mind "renters" on a formal lease instead of just allowing people to come and go and possibly cause problems. I use the saying that lessees pick up beer cans and people who come and go on open properties usually throw out beer cans; sad but true - lots of good guys but one bad apple ruins it for everyone. I'd prefer to own property to hunt on but financially it's not feasible when I can lease for a fraction of the cost and have the same enjoyments. I do however agree that these so called "outfitters" are a huge problem. They run around and lease anything and everything then sell week hunts or whatever to make money when the landowner should be reaping the benefits if they choose to lease their rights. It is sad to hear AEP and other state owned properties are going to be leased and not open to those who can't afford to buy or lease. I think it should be a private land option only; the state needs to have place for people to hunt if they want people to buy tags.
Appreciate the welcome HicksLawns -
A little background on myself and hunting situation in Ohio-- Married with 2 little girls and addicted to the pursuit of whitetails. I own my own businesses; one I assist landowners with oil and gas divestment opportunities and the other, I just started with a friend of mine, a local growing contracting business.
As far as hunting -- We've leased approx. 1500 acres in Ohio since 2008/2009 and have implemented different management strategies. We started with a 130 inch minimum and quickly realized that if we wanted a shot at a much larger buck then we had to go to an age restriction and harvest only 5 year old deer or older (especially after having 2 year olds killed that went over 130). We develop a list each year of confirmed 5 year olds and older that we have a history with as well as a list of young bucks that need additional age. We take food plots very seriously but have learnt that food isn't the only thing it takes to grow and hold big bucks. We try to keep our does in check and currently we feel we have overshot our does to a certain degree; especially with the help of additional coyotes we've seen recently. We implement parking areas, number of stand locations, and forbid anyone on the farm during the entire month of september to reduce pressure prior to season, only with many other little things to better the odds. We've learned a lot over the years and continue to do so, So by no means do I nor anyone else in our group feel we are pros when it comes to growing, keeping, and killing big whitetails. We have a great relationship with our landowner and would walk on fire for anything he or his family would need.
As far as non resident tag increases, leasing, outfitters, etc etc I agree 100% with HicksLawns in regards to this is a no win debate. If people were coming into my state I'd probably have the same grumblings and those doing the grumbling would defend the non resident position if the roles were reversed. Also in southern WV there are plenty of giant bucks especially in the 4 bow only counties but the poaching is rampant, theft is never ending, hunting an area exclusively is impossible, and bad apples seem to outcount the good ones; not to mention 1 game warden per county in laughable at best considering the terrain and miles and miles of vacant land to patrol by ONE man. Those are the reasons I left WV and have never hunted my now home state of PA; not just because OH does more to protect their deer. To me ODNR puts more weight on the biology of the herd versus number of tags they can sell like other states nearby.
Ultimately I don't think there is a perfect scenario because OH, KY, Illinois, and many other states aren't going to say who can hunt and who can't; unless they all go to a draw system such as Iowa. I think times have changed and the capitalism of hunting has changed the "sport" to a "business" for many which I don't agree with to a certain degree. I'll be the first to say I don't enjoy paying the kind of money I pay to hunt exclusive ground but its an option and I choose to because I love the chase and everything that comes with management of whitetails (to the best of our knowledge of course). I also believe that nothing in life, including what land we all get to hunt, is fair. I make the most of my abilities and wish everyone else the best of luck whichever state, option, method they choose.
I've read TOO for a long time and enjoy it much more than archery talk and other forums. Thanks again for the welcome and best of luck to all.