Strother23
Member
I think they can even shoot deer on someone else's property that they rent.. How's that for a poke in the eye.
I think this is true also.
I think they can even shoot deer on someone else's property that they rent.. How's that for a poke in the eye.
Our DoW is a joke, and any additional funding is a waste IMO. When is the last time any of you called a WO about a violation you witnessed and actually had one show up? It doesn't happen, from my experience. They do not seem to care if someone shoots a deer, two times in one week, with a rifle in front of your house. If you chase the people clear into town and scribble down their lic. plate number, they will say you have given them a bad number. This is what I've heard, even though I was 20 feet off the vehicles bumper with a clear view of the plate and the nervous vehicle occupants. I think they devalue deer to the point they just don't care. Just another dead deer, and to them, that's a good thing. Unless of course they happen to be out during gun season and can find a hunter walking around without a pen in his pocket...then all heck breaks loose and the ticket book comes out.
I had great faith in the ODOW. Those people that I respected have long since retired. The ODOW of the last 20 years is a joke!
Did I ever tell you all about my first deer? I'm gonna...
I was 10, hunting with a bow behind my parents' Pickaway Co. home. Three deer came by. The first one offered no shot. The second was a doe, shot her and she ran off. I don't know what I expected the deer to do, but when she ran off I though I might have missed the 10 yard shot. I put another arrow on the string and a little 4 point came following her. I shot him too, he ran off. Keep in mind, I was a kid and in 1982, there were no hunting shows... I had no idea what to expect when I shot a deer. I called my dad from the farmer's house and told him I'd shot at 2. He was immediately ticked off. We had work to do, so we went back the next day to look for my deer. We found the heart-shot doe 50 yards into a crp field, stone dead. We continued the search and found the lung shot buck too. First thing Dad did was call Earl Wallace, our Pickaway Co. WO. He came out, gave me a stern lecture about making sure of the shot, practicing a great deal...the whole bit. And, he hauled my illegally harvested buck off to give to a needy family. He wouldn't allow me to keep the small antlers, nothing. I was lucky he let dad snap a picture. I was extremely lucky he did not write me a ticket, and he told me as much. I feared and respected the game laws that were put in place for a reason! Today, I guarantee a WO would not even show up if called in that situation. Most likely, they would say, "leave it lay", and wouldn't even follow up beyond that. I learned a LOT of lessons with my first deer...and second. I don't think today's WO would bother to teach them. Waste of public funds, that's how I view our DOW.
Tonk himself told us they were trying to raise them. Started going on about how the tag and license fees haven't been raise in years. The trouble they were having at that time was with the department of tourism. They didn't want the NR licenses raised because it may drive away NR hunters. As for residents, expect a fee increase soon. He also talked about a fee for hunting public land. Like a public land hunting permit specific to the property you're hunting. The problem there was the federal land. They could do it easy on state lands but it would be much harder to get it approved for places like WNF. And if they did it for one and not the other they feared it would push too many people to WNF leaving the others unhunted and the deer population would grow.
So, let me see if I got this straight.
Tags sales are declining consistently due to lack of interest which is a result of poor management practices for several years. Thus, people are becoming more reluctant to participate. The response to that trend by the DOW will be to raise the cost to participate. Seriously?
I guess I don't get it as I don't have a PHD, and I'm not a wildlife biologist. Though, it seems counter intuitive to me.
Division of wildlife banned me from commenting on their Facebook posts. Fuggin assholes, that's some communist bullshit.
Ha! That is awesome! Apparently someone actually read what you had to say.
Simple in a way when they ask for comments then don't permit the responses the don't like.
I found it interesting that approx. in 2014 91K antlerless deer and 59K antlered deer have been harvested. I would have thought the spread would be greater in more antlerless number.
Ted, there has to be some does killed. It's the nature of the beast. The problem comes along when we can't agree on what "some" is. The fact remains, to keep a herd level, to keep them from expanding in numbers too far, we have to kill some. My issue is that the DOW's plan was and is to throw crap on the wall and see what sticks. It is quite simply a matter of issuing tags and adding seasons until the numbers get so low hunters raise heck. It seems to me with the amount of sportsmen's dollars involved, we should have a better plan! The number of deer we had in the mid-90's seemed ideal to me. There were plenty of deer to entertain sportsmen, and for the farmers who thought there were too many, nuisance permits were issued. It worked, imo. Tonk simply added seasons and tags to keep cutting the herd more and more to get to the point we are now. And where we are now, is mighty low in places!