I'm not sure I'm at full liberty to say what I'm up to, so I'll spare the details until I get that answer, but let's say I've found myself at the table with a "coalition" of sportsmen from around Ohio with the opportunity to influence/inform policy decisions at a state and/or federal level. Before I head into the first meeting, I want to turn to TOOville for some input. Keep in mind this isn't strictly deer hunting related, so things like clean water, habitat restoration, public land access, etc. are all on the table.
That said, I'll pose the question like this: If you could make any one change to Ohio's hunting and fishing regulations/policies/etc., what would you do? What would be your Plan B if you couldn't execute Plan A for some reason?
Fire away boys!
That said, I'll pose the question like this: If you could make any one change to Ohio's hunting and fishing regulations/policies/etc., what would you do? What would be your Plan B if you couldn't execute Plan A for some reason?
Fire away boys!
Part of me wants no baiting allowed period but then I think about the lucky guy that has access to crop fields or apple trees on his property. He's legal to hunt but his neighbor is not allowed to dump apples or grain for the same opportunities. So I'm ok with the baiting. I really don't understand why you can bait a deer and not a turkey. If a man buys a tag kills only the one bird that's legal why is that wrong. I get the sporting part of it but a lot of people can only hunt on the weekends. That's not very much time. He payed for his tag and a dead bird is a dead bird. Why should he be judged. I guess they fear to many birds will be killed. I'm sure that's the answer now that I think it though
