Big_Holla
Senior Member
And they are probably going to lump it with another chunk of land for more acreage. Sucks though!!
Yep Adams Co. Might have to break out the old camping gear and head down to the Wayne with Coonie and the gang, dang I hate climbing those hills!
Right wrong or whatever there is one common message here and on all of the other threads that discuss losing land to someone leasing.
You as a hunter or hunting group have not done enough with the landowner for them to leave the hunting rights with you rather than lease them to someone else that they don't even know.
If you have been hunting these properties for years and the landowner leases them out from under you without notice or consideration then you need only to look in the mirror to see the problem. You had no perceived value to the landowner and they displaced you. Apparently hunters had a higher regard for the relationship than the landowner did.
Not to be critical but times change and you need to change with them. If you are not bringing value to the landowner in some form you risk being displaced. Hunters need to be proactive in preserving these relationships and access.
Just for the record I do not like leasing companies and believe there should be very stringent regulations, licensing, income reporting and taxation, and over sight of that growing industry. Way too many abuses in my mind.
Just reality guys
I don't necessarily agree wit this. Money talks more often than not. Especially in this economy.. Large landowners are aging and on fixed incomes. Couple that with the loss of a spouse and widowers tend to do their own thing. As older landowners pass away the younger generations who inherit it largely have no respect for the ownership of land. Land is just something they have to pay taxes on, not something of personal value like generations before them saw it to be. Land for many old timers was their livelihood, their means of taking care of their family, and something to be proud of. Now it's given to children who have never had to struggle or fall back on the land.. They work their busy 9-5, buy meat from Kroger, and rush home to watch Jersey shore. So they either sell it, bust it up and sell it, lease it Corporate Ag, lease the hunting rights, rape the timber, and split the mineral rights. We as hunters have no value to these airs to the land. To them daddy's land is a financial burden if they keep it, or a cash cow to exploit. What do they care. they live in Columbus now, not Hickory Creek.
Jackalope,
All good points, and I'm sure it varies for property to property and hunter to hunter, owner to owner.
The reality probably falls somewhere between our views
Right wrong or whatever there is one common message here and on all of the other threads that discuss losing land to someone leasing.
You as a hunter or hunting group have not done enough with the landowner for them to leave the hunting rights with you rather than lease them to someone else that they don't even know.
If you have been hunting these properties for years and the landowner leases them out from under you without notice or consideration then you need only to look in the mirror to see the problem. You had no perceived value to the landowner and they displaced you. Apparently hunters had a higher regard for the relationship than the landowner did.
Not to be critical but times change and you need to change with them. If you are not bringing value to the landowner in some form you risk being displaced. Hunters need to be proactive in preserving these relationships and access.
Just for the record I do not like leasing companies and believe there should be very stringent regulations, licensing, income reporting and taxation, and over sight of that growing industry. Way too many abuses in my mind.
Just reality guys