I hate to speak for Chad as well. I have heard him say those words though. I get what Kaiser is saying. I get what Chad was trying to say. My counties were only 700-800 deer counties prior to the increase in tags. Then we jumped to 1100-1200 deer/season counties. NOT seeing deer has been the norm. Where I differentiate is in MY area the small groups of 4-6 does I would see are now 1-2 or maybe 3. Where it was good to see one shooter from the stand per season 3-4yrs ago (putting in 150-250hrs per season), I am seeing more shooters or borderline shooters now. I feel it is the reduced does. It makes for excellent buck hunting. . . for awhile. As I said before, I hope it doesn't get worse in his area. I have 2-3 places to hunt and those are getting tougher to keep or find new ones. Access to couple hundred acres on 2-3 properties combined limits my abilities to "go find the deer" if they are not in my area. Some people are more fortunate and have access to thousands of acres. These people see deer run dry on a 100acre farm, they move to a different property until they find deer. Simply different options for everyone. Not everyone has this much ground to search for deer.
I get what Milo was saying too. His option to drop property A and simply move to property B or C may not exist. If there are minimal deer on any of those properties, more people hunting, more people trespassing, less deer available. . . .It isn't good.
I get what Milo was saying too. His option to drop property A and simply move to property B or C may not exist. If there are minimal deer on any of those properties, more people hunting, more people trespassing, less deer available. . . .It isn't good.