at1010
*Supporting Member*
- 5,479
- 172
EHD + Harvest Pressure = Recovery Trouble
I’ve been running numbers on Ohio deer densities, using 20–25 deer per square mile and a 36-square-mile township as the baseline. Here’s what happens when disease and harvest overlap:
How much to cut the harvest?
Use this rule of thumb: harvest must be below net recruitment.
Please poke holes where needed. I have spent way too much time on this and hope it helps someone’s thinking.
I’ve been running numbers on Ohio deer densities, using 20–25 deer per square mile and a 36-square-mile township as the baseline. Here’s what happens when disease and harvest overlap:
- 30% EHD kill + 27% harvest (statewide average): Herd does not recover. Net recruitment (~15–20% in many areas) cannot keep pace with a 27% annual harvest.
- 40% EHD kill + 27% harvest: Same outcome. Continued decline.
- 50% EHD kill + 27% harvest: Decline is sharper. Even at a strong 25% net recruitment, you are still at –2% per year.
How much to cut the harvest?
Use this rule of thumb: harvest must be below net recruitment.
- If we assume an average 15% net recruitment, the total harvest needs to be ≤12% to allow growth at a reasonable pace.
- From ~27% down to ~12% is about a 55% reduction in total harvest. That is where the “cut by ~55%” figure comes from.
Please poke holes where needed. I have spent way too much time on this and hope it helps someone’s thinking.