does it just seem to be an abnormally high incident rates with wildlife officers? I mean there are a lot of police officers on the streets and I don' think we hear that many stories of them doing stuff like this or morally "irresponsible" behavior like I seem to be seeing in ohio. theoretically there are FAR fewer wildlife officers than police officers so one would think would be more of these behavior issue with police.
I think the WO's have a lot of "old school" unwritten policies and what-not that are still being implemented... Things that were probably the norm back in the day, but shouldn't be today. Hunting while on the clock, "looking the other way" when a fellow out-of-state WO comes into town, etc etc etc... Like, it's ok to do this but don't tell anybody you're doing it types of things. And once the media gets ahold of ONE incident or allegation, they keep digging for more... pretty soon you have a domino effect. I would be willing to bet that police departments do the same type of shit, maybe even more, but they're so spread out and segregated that things are swept under the rug more easily. The Division of Wildlife WO's are basically one big police department... The eyes of the ENTIRE STATE are on them, not just one community here or there.
They should be augmented to the county sheriff department.. The sheriffs department has, drug investigators, bomb squads, swat, murder, etc.. Augmenting a wildlife officer into the command should be very easy. They still take orders and directive from the state division of wildlife, but their supervisor, radio checks, and place of duty is the county sheriffs office.
I don't really understand the point of this or what it would accomplish. The DOW's law enforcement divisions are much more complex than I think you realize. Trust me, these WO's have plenty of supervision...
Last edited: