I’m at a conundrum, at my age, I don’t see a lifetime license worth the cost.
Wonder what the charges are for the 10 year?
Wonder what the charges are for the 10 year?
I’m at a conundrum, at my age, I don’t see a lifetime license worth the cost.
Wonder what the charges are for the 10 year?
173.50 according to website.
Jon, that consists of both hunting and fishing?
So do you even have to be a resident to get it?
So do you even have to be a resident to get it?
Thanks for that link, answered all my question very clearly.Looks like Ohio residents only at the time of purchase.
http://wildlife.ohiodnr.gov/hunting...ing-trapping-regulations/licenses-and-permits
Jesus Christ... You guys would bitch about anything wouldn't you?
This is a convenient option for some people... Not ALL. If you don't like it don't buy one. If you're older than 60, you probably shouldn't buy one. If you're 40 and under, and don't see yourself going anywhere, it's a no-brainer. As far as kids go, buy it now and they're good to go. They'll be apprentice status until they pass hunter Ed, then the license updates and they get a new card when they're 18.
19 years at the CURRENT rate, which is long overdue for an increase. I understand if you don't feel it's worthwhile for YOU, but that doesn't mean it's a stupid idea or that there's no incentive. There is an obvious incentive for anyone hunting more than 20 years... Maybe less if/when the price goes up. And increased license sales dollars equates to increased utilization of federal PR dollars. More money for land acquisition and land management. If you don't see an incentive in that I don't know what to tell you.Huh. It's almost like people are independent thinkers free to form their own opinions or something. Strange.
It would also be convenient for me to pay my monthly cable bill a year in advance. But I don't because there's zero incentive to do so. I don't view the 5 minutes a year I spend buying a license as "inconvenient" as its quite simply the most convenient process ever.
Now for my kids and I it might make sense because I plan to move to a different state. However I very well may come back quite often to hunt with family and friends. A lifetime license at $450 produces a cost benefit within 4 years of not having to buy a NR license. Add kids on that and it begins to show substantial savings. Now If I planned to live here it would take me 19 years to break even. Hardly worth it unless prices go up substantially later. Who knows, in 10 years the DNR could have the hunting so fucked up in this state I just decide to fish instead.
19 years at the CURRENT rate, which is long overdue for an increase. I understand if you don't feel it's worthwhile for YOU, but that doesn't mean it's a stupid idea or that there's no incentive. There is an obvious incentive for anyone hunting more than 20 years... Maybe less if/when the price goes up. And increased license sales dollars equates to increased utilization of federal PR dollars. More money for land acquisition and land management. If you don't see an incentive in that I don't know what to tell you.