- 39,186
- 274
I have agreed with you in regard to the hunter transportation issue so that's a moot point. My issue is nothing is being done to proactively limit the KNOWN source, deer farms. If we are willing to impact an over one billion dollar Ohio industry that is hunting we should be willing to do the same to a sector of farming.
As for what's in place now the farm is quarantined once it is found. The problem is it is rarely found prior to an investigation of how it got there. Only then is it found to exist at the shipping farm who has also sent deer all over the country to other states by then. This is a reactive approach that does not proactively stop the spread. An appropriate response would be the same as the US department of Agriculture has for importation of animals to the US. The animal is quarantined in a federal facility until cleared at the expense of the importer. This would proactively stem the known threat vector to Ohio.
As for what's in place now the farm is quarantined once it is found. The problem is it is rarely found prior to an investigation of how it got there. Only then is it found to exist at the shipping farm who has also sent deer all over the country to other states by then. This is a reactive approach that does not proactively stop the spread. An appropriate response would be the same as the US department of Agriculture has for importation of animals to the US. The animal is quarantined in a federal facility until cleared at the expense of the importer. This would proactively stem the known threat vector to Ohio.