I had an experience with this very scenario about a decade ago hunting with a friend. He's a smart guy who picked up hunting after college once he found out how delicious venison was. He had only been hunting a few years at this time and had already filled his "buck" tag during bow season. Lucky for him we were sitting together during a hunt in muzzleloader season. I hadn't yet filled a "buck" tag that year so when a young fork-horn stepped out he asked if I was going to shoot. I declined, and he started to raise his gun. I asked him what he was doing, and he said he was going to shoot since I wasn't going to! Quickly I corrected him, and the young buck lived to see another day. His response was that he figured the store messed up when issuing his tag because it said "either sex."
The point being there is obviously room to improve the way the state manages the tags.
Yes, I agree 100% it is the hunter's responsibility to know that you can only kill one antlered deer per season.
But (and there's always a but) the state should have a buck tag and issue antlerless tags on a county by county, or region by region basis like Ryan mentioned above.
There is shared responsibility to improve. It's pretty clear in this case that both hunters and the state can do better...
The point being there is obviously room to improve the way the state manages the tags.
Yes, I agree 100% it is the hunter's responsibility to know that you can only kill one antlered deer per season.
But (and there's always a but) the state should have a buck tag and issue antlerless tags on a county by county, or region by region basis like Ryan mentioned above.
There is shared responsibility to improve. It's pretty clear in this case that both hunters and the state can do better...