Typicality you can look at it and see what it's life has been like.. If it's beat you rest assure its not worth it... Not to say it'll be perfect but if it looks lightly used then it's more than likely that....
Other thing to consider here is dad and I both have a thing for old shotguns. Don't buy a lot, but look a lot. This has a "cool" factor for us that's worth something.
Nope, just a 1187.
I keep reading here that Remington quality has dropped, but for me there is a line between paying for something old and worn out (not saying this gun is) vs. having newer designs & technology. The question/gamble is just how bad or how high is the risk of the new version not performing as well as this old one? Donno, just saying I could not spend $400 on pump shotgun that is 47yrs old without doing a comparison. If the gun was 99%, no question. I just don't' see that in this picture and I am not a gun expert nor have I ever been to a gun show.
If I had a choice between this gun for $400 and a free express I'd pay $400.
I agree. They preach a lot today about machine tolerances and better steel etc. I think it's a load of crap. To me that just means they found a more efficient way to cut corners. The midmarket gun industry has gone from experienced gunsmiths completing the fit and finish by hand; to cranking them off an assembly line and having a trained monkey do quality-control with a go no-go template.
I agree. They preach a lot today about machine tolerances and better steel etc. I think it's a load of crap. To me that just means they found a more efficient way to cut corners. The midmarket gun industry has gone from experienced gunsmiths completing the fit and finish by hand; to cranking them off an assembly line and having a trained monkey do quality-control with a go no-go template.