This.
@at1010, our mental masturbation here is founded on your personal opinion of a utopian Ohio whitetail herd and hunting experience. Given the complexity of the stakeholder base at the state level, there will never be a unanimously adopted, definitive problem statement made. Like Jamie, I'm approaching this from my vision of a perfect state.
Ive given lots of the posts in this thread some thought, mainly because I disagree with just about all of them...but this one kinda distilled things down for me. If we aren't able to define what the problem is, then we will never be able to solve it. I understand your point about this thread being a discussion on what each of us individually would like to see change to improve our individual hunting experiences. But that's not something the WRC can implement.
Your mention of the complexity of the stakeholder base is spot on. There are hundreds of thousands of hunters in this state who have wildly differing opinions on what they want to see in terms of deer hunting. From the WRC's perspective they have to take that into account, along with politics from the legislature and executive branch. They also have to deal with the special interest groups, farmers, insurance companies, and citizens who complain about deer eating their flower gardens and totaling their SUVs.
Given the disparity of stakeholders and their goals, the best the WRC can do is manage the state's deer population with an eye towards numbers, health and age. They should (IMHO) do this with as small a regulatory footprint as possible. The individuals in a given area can then take the deer they have and manage them how they wish. If there aren't enough people around who want to deal with TDM and the inevitible BS that goes along with it, they can vote by killing whatever suits them.
I don't think the WRC should be in the business of growing big deer. They should be in the business of growing a healthy deer herd that can sustain the pressure put on it by hunters, disease, and predation. Personally, the only problem I have with hunting here in Ohio is finding private land to hunt on, either via permission or via a club. I don't want to make the endeavor any more difficult than it already is because I don't hunt for the challenge. Neither do I care about antlers. I hunt because I want to fill the freezer and I like being out in the woods. Personally, I'd be happy to have a ton of 4-6pts on my property that I can kill, vs a third as many 10-12pts that I never see. So, I'm just fine with baiting (corn, minerals, urine etc), crossbows, long seasons etc. I do think we need to cut down on OOS hunters though.
I guess I don't understand why people always want to force other people to hunt the way they do. My goals are not the same as others, and what gives me enjoyment may not move the needle for you, and vice versa. The bottom line to me is that we each need to determine what we need to enjoy hunting with a minimum of impact to others. Most of us just want to be left alone to enjoy the time allocated to us...hunting is no different.