If the average hunter only kills 1.2 or 1.3 deer per year, what does it matter anyway? Sure, extra days could result in more successful hunters getting that one deer. But my guess is, if folks aren’t crafty enough to kill a deer within the already lengthy timespan we have available currently, adding a month isn’t going to make much of a difference.
I don't disagree in this instance. I don;t see it being much of an impact. But it is just one more area of additional opportunity. They could simply be doing it as a pilot with expansion plans later on. Opportunity increases success in the face of reduced availability. Increasing opportunity is what gets deer killed and numbers reduced. Adding things like bonus gun seasons, the ability to use rifles, expanded archery seasons, early muzzle loaded seasons, cheaper tags etc.
I always use the analogy of 20 deer in a100 acre woodlot and I'm allowed one deer.
Give me a spear and a one week season with a density like that, and the odds are good that I'll kill one.
Now if there were only 4 deer in that 100 acre woodlot, my odds of success go way down if I'm hampered by the same weapon and season restrictions. So they increase opportunity and let me use a bow and give me an extra week and I hunt 4 extra days. Now I'm back to having pretty good odds of harvest.
At the end of the season the numbers killed and success rate remained the same, but the reality is ,there are only 20% of the deer left in that woodblock. That's precisely why we can't count deer by counting dead deer, especially if we continue to add opportunity. Expand that added opportunity method across the state with hundreds of thousands of hunters and they can maintain individual success rates despite a much smaller population of animals. Whereas if opportunity remained constant there would be a noticeable and drastic reduction is success.
Deer management follows the same logic. The less deer you have, the less you need to kill to continue reducing the population. The less deer you have the more opportunity you need to maintain a consistent success rate. If you look at the final numbers it'll look apples to apples. But there are huge factors to that success that aren't being accounted for and mask reality.
Not accounting for an increase in vehicles and licensed drivers Ohio's Deer vehicle accident rates are half of what they were 15 years ago. Either Ohio's drivers got 100% better at missing deer, or we have half the population of deer.